Gave me some ideas about how things should be structured. Apparently
merely using region-data-locked threads doesn't eliminate the need
for synchronization/locking. It just means your synchronization is much
lighter, in the form of localized variables.
It seems we'll need to maintain boolean trackers for certain
operations that shouldn't be performed concomitantly, and deny
the caller access to those operations in order to preserve
data sanity.
I guess we still ended up using locking after all. Tbh, I'm not even
sure this will make things end up being lighter: we may have to bounce
requests off, or perhaps re-enqueue them into the queue?
So maybe instead of bouncing requests off, we could re-add them to the
rear of the queue when they conflict with an ongoing request.
This language is used broadly to specify how to attach (and thus
also how to detach) devices to/from Salmanoff. The next bit of work
we'll do is split off the DSL parsing from the management of the
list of parsed binary attached spec objects.
We'll be creating a PipeDeviceAttachmentParser, and later on when
we support URDF, we'll create a URDFDeviceAttachmentParser.
hayodea