This performs a more complete device initialization and attachment
sequence. We'll do the corresponding teardown in the shutdown
sequence later.
We might probably do it as deviceRoleGoneAwayInd()
We've decided to add a separate notion of a DeviceRole to track attached
device roles now. We no longer use the collection of deviceSpecs to
track which roles have been attached. Rather, this list will simply
collate all known deviceAttachment specs which are expected to be
maintained in an attached state.
SMO can periodically scan through these and cross-reference this
collection with the collection of attachedDeviceRoles. Then it can
re-try to attach those which aren't currently attached at any given
moment. This will give resilience against device attachment failures
or device resets/malfunctions, at runtime.
This is logically cleaner and it begins preparing our next set
of restructuring changes. To wit: we're revamping the device
manager to distinguish between devices and their roles.
Gave me some ideas about how things should be structured. Apparently
merely using region-data-locked threads doesn't eliminate the need
for synchronization/locking. It just means your synchronization is much
lighter, in the form of localized variables.
It seems we'll need to maintain boolean trackers for certain
operations that shouldn't be performed concomitantly, and deny
the caller access to those operations in order to preserve
data sanity.
I guess we still ended up using locking after all. Tbh, I'm not even
sure this will make things end up being lighter: we may have to bounce
requests off, or perhaps re-enqueue them into the queue?
So maybe instead of bouncing requests off, we could re-add them to the
rear of the queue when they conflict with an ongoing request.
This language is used broadly to specify how to attach (and thus
also how to detach) devices to/from Salmanoff. The next bit of work
we'll do is split off the DSL parsing from the management of the
list of parsed binary attached spec objects.
We'll be creating a PipeDeviceAttachmentParser, and later on when
we support URDF, we'll create a URDFDeviceAttachmentParser.