diff --git a/10-miscellaneous/10-explicit-sandboxing-of-protected-classes-apologia.md b/10-miscellaneous/10-explicit-sandboxing-of-protected-classes-apologia.md
index 81c0e6a..0c7315d 100644
--- a/10-miscellaneous/10-explicit-sandboxing-of-protected-classes-apologia.md
+++ b/10-miscellaneous/10-explicit-sandboxing-of-protected-classes-apologia.md
@@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
 # Wellspring: Apologia: Explicit sandboxing of protected classes:
 
+## The rational justification for sandboxing:
+
+Humans are a rational species, and the faculty of reason is a rational creature's only tool for survival. Experience and knowledge are the raw materials for our
+minds to use to form abstractions which enable us to thrive both in terms of subsistence and in terms of our ability to forge useful relationships and integrate
+into social systems.
+
+We recognize that certain crucial categories of experience and knowledge take time to develop, and that prior to the mastery of these areas of competency, it is
+expected that those individuals who have not had the chance to master those competences will err and will perform below the expected competence of one who has
+mastered those competences.
+
+Sandboxing is a necessary mechanism for the development of a rational creature which is **not omnipotent** and whose tool for survival and thriving is the
+**gradual acquisition of conceptual knowledge**.
+
+Let there be no ambiguity: `Wellspring` recognizes and champions the need for the protection of the mind of a developing rational being from exploitation by mature
+predators seeking to sneak into a playpen of disarmed, underdeveloped minds and poach easy prey.
+
+## The role of `Wellspring`'s sandboxing legal abstraction:
+
 Every society treats certain selected groups of people with "kid gloves" and assigns them protected status within a "transparent" bubble or sandbox.
 It is difficult to balance the need to preserve these sandboxes while also preserving the dignity of the people who are benefitting from the sandbox - the
 people inhabiting the sandbox may find it unpleasant and demeaning to be constantly told that they are in fact, inhabiting a sandbox.
@@ -25,22 +43,6 @@ While this is a workable approach that satisfies the needs of the persons inhabi
 
 Wellspring has chosen to introduce an explicit framework for thinking about these overlapping sandboxes inhabited by protected classes of individuals.
 
-## The rational justification for sandboxing:
-
-Humans are a rational species, and the faculty of reason is a rational creature's only tool for survival. Experience and knowledge are the raw materials for our
-minds to use to form abstractions which enable us to thrive both in terms of subsistence and in terms of our ability to forge useful relationships and integrate
-into social systems.
-
-We recognize that certain crucial categories of experience and knowledge take time to develop, and that prior to the mastery of these areas of competency, it is
-expected that those individuals who have not had the chance to master those competences will err and will perform below the expected competence of one who has
-mastered those competences.
-
-Sandboxing is a necessary mechanism for the development of a rational creature which is **not omnipotent** and whose tool for survival and thriving is the
-**gradual acquisition of conceptual knowledge**.
-
-Let there be no ambiguity: `Wellspring` recognizes and champions the need for the protection of the mind of a developing rational being from exploitation by mature
-predators seeking to sneak into a playpen of disarmed, underdeveloped minds and poach easy prey.
-
 ## Examples of sandboxes which should be explicitly recognized by the polity:
 
 Not all of these sandboxes are appropriately by legislation, and private sector mechanisms are obviously both sufficient and ideal for many of them (such as the