Update 15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ One of the problems that previous iterations of individualist polities had is th
|
||||
|
||||
This mechanism replaces things like the FDA and EPA with an open process in court which is subject to a jury of peers rather than to the whim of an unelected panel of beaurocrats and the caprice of politically unaccountable appointees. The solution to this problem was never to create a pantheon of unaccountable 3-letter government agencies. It was merely to be innovative and think of how to apply the current private property process to new phenomena.
|
||||
|
||||
Innovators working with harmful materials for which there is not yet a known containment and harnessing framework should be able to work within this legal framework to safely experiment and productize their innovation.
|
||||
Innovators working with harmful materials for which there is not yet a known containment and harnessing framework should be able to work within this legal framework to safely experiment and productize their innovation, by conducting their lab/study in a geographically isolated or sparsely populated area where no 3rd parties can be harmed, or where such 3rd parties give informed consent to the ongoing NAHA.
|
||||
|
||||
It is intentional that the requirement to be able to demonstrate a working, deployed containment method, or a ready rollback mechanism imposes capital barriers. Only those conagents which can front the capitals to safely handle such volatile activities without while preserving non-interference, should be able to attempt such innovative activities. That is indeed, the meaning of "responsible innovation".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user