From 4c328d5dd34df1aee04bb138a84d9f8490387b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wellspringcp <69349872+wellspringcp@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:59:32 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] Update 11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md

---
 .../11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md              | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/11-contagions-and-biohazards/11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md b/11-contagions-and-biohazards/11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md
index 49563a1..50076fd 100644
--- a/11-contagions-and-biohazards/11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md
+++ b/11-contagions-and-biohazards/11-01-sovereign-contagion-and-biohazard-law.md
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ In other words, instead of taxing and spending and centralizing the polity's CBi
 
 The `SovCBio` branch shall have the power to regularly audit natures owners to ensure their compliance with `SovCBio` law and to file suits of negligence against those natures owners who fail to comply, and legislatively defined penalties shall be imposed on those natures owners found to be guilty. Penalties for non-compliance shall not include loss of title to the natures unless the peculiar position and nature of that natures makes it such that a particular instance of non-compliance by the owner raises a systemic 3rd party risk of harm which the `NAHA` mechanism is not sufficient to manage.
 
+> [Apologia]: Think of a way to do something similar to the vendable warrants to enlist private individuals to do the auditing work and file suits against natures owners for not meeting these injunctions.
+
 In general it is intended that the natures owner ensure that their tenancy/rental contracts with their tenants enable the natures owners to do such works and upgrades as are required to meet due diligence injunctions, and obviously all such injunctions shall come into effect after legislatively defined grace periods.
 
 ## `SovCBio` general populace injunctions: