From 657bd11a205167954d9ce5608e032093c34182c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wellspringcp <69349872+wellspringcp@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:28:08 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Update 15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md

---
 15-torts-and-coordination/15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/15-torts-and-coordination/15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md b/15-torts-and-coordination/15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md
index 42831e0..030507e 100644
--- a/15-torts-and-coordination/15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md
+++ b/15-torts-and-coordination/15-02-dehumanizing-speech.md
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 
 > [Apologia]: If we had gone the "portray as less than human" route, we would have to reason about what constitutes a statement that has the effect of portraying someone in a particular light, etc, etc. Very difficult. We would have to deconstruct and then fix in a definition, why slurs are harmful, etc, etc. Very difficult. I think it's best to just let the action lie for statements made about biologically innate attributes.
 
+> [Apologia]: This entire mechanism is experimental and I'm frankly not sure whether or not it will make it into the final version.
+
 It shall be a defense if the statement being made about the person is factually true; for example, if a person is crippled, then making the statement that s/he is a cripple incurs no liability.
 
 This form of liability only applies to biologically innate attributes.