From 7d53c19ecc80250f334242cbbb2582c119a81d34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: patergentium Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:31:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update 07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md --- 07-military/Xx-hiring-the-sovwi.md | 3 --- 07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 07-military/Xx-hiring-the-sovwi.md create mode 100644 07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md diff --git a/07-military/Xx-hiring-the-sovwi.md b/07-military/Xx-hiring-the-sovwi.md deleted file mode 100644 index 233bd94..0000000 --- a/07-military/Xx-hiring-the-sovwi.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -# djfjf - -The idea is that we could sell protection to ships for income? \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md b/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d55d9fe --- /dev/null +++ b/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# djfjf + +The idea is that we could sell protection to ships for income? + +This fixes the "protection of sea lanes" problem. It also gives us a direct mandate to patrol the seas. + +Alternatively, we could have a framework wherein we allow mercenaries to operate in international waters, but have theor headquarters in our polity. They can be held responsible in our courts, though I don't strictly know how. We may decide to require that they post a kind of "bond deposit" of assets that will force them to have to commit to our jurisdiction. The explicit aim of such a mechanism would be to have them commit a quantity of resources that would make it unviable for them to attempt to split their HQ into multiple locations, and so to make them have to commit to our jurisdiction. +