Update 07-2-sovereign-war-infrastructure.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,7 +15,10 @@ Under the auspices of `SovWI`, the military branch is the only one authorized to
|
||||
|
||||
Sovereign infrastructure shall be planned carefully before title to any natures is sold by the government. In any natures title sale, the military shall have preferential procurement priority and privilege, pending justification as a national security asset, according with the published security and war readiness reports. In effect, the military shall have limited veto powers in infrastructure planning to ensure the war readiness of the military, subject to the published war readiness plan.
|
||||
|
||||
## Eminent domain
|
||||
|
||||
Where an asset necessary for war readiness is already possessed by a legal person, the reimbursement rate for eminent domain shall be 120% market value, as valued by the Externality Auction. Congress shall pass no laws making it a crime for private entities to speculatively purchase natureses expecting them to be security assets in the future. That said, in order to ensure that procurements do not become a mechanism for paralyzing the military, the auction service price standard may be capped within the price range of a natures of similar value and need not be the price that the specific natures in question lists for.
|
||||
|
||||
All sovereign infrastructure which is rented out to the public (such as roads and rail, or communications) shall have a clearly defined revocation clause explaining that in the event of war, such infrastructure may become unavailable for public use indefinitely, even for paying private customers.
|
||||
## Wartime interruption of service
|
||||
|
||||
All sovereign infrastructure which is rented out to the public (such as roads and rail, or communications) shall have a clearly defined revocation clause explaining that in the event of war, such infrastructure may become unavailable for public use indefinitely, even for paying private customers. The government shall make all reasonable attempts however, to avoid having to invoke this clause by anticipating its service-level requirements for war during peacetime and specifying them to the contract awardees so that in the event of war, there will be scant need for this clause.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user