Update 01-01-principles.md

01-principles/01-01-principles.md

@@ -69,7 +69,9 @@ The private property of the individual may only be breached in the pursuit of th
   - `WS` does not espouse the notion that parents have absolute power over their children since children are individuals as much as sui juris conagents are. Biological parents are the explicit, legally enforced guardians of their children owing to the fact that it was the parents' unilateral choice to bring the child into existence and the child was not consulted. Hence parents take on legal accountability for the protection of the life, property and sexuality of their children until such time that they reach sui juris. The legislature shall define laws to protect the life, property and sexuality of children from violation, while they have not yet matured to sui juris.
 - In as much also, as communicable diseases and biohazards are a market failure whose urgency demands that the gradual hand of the market to reach equilibrium be bypassed for expeditious measures: communicable (and only communicable) diseases and biohazards shall be an exception to individual sovereignty, within the parameters outlined in `SovCBio` law.
 - The preparedness of the nation for war to protect the private property of `WS` residents, within the parameters outlined in `SovWI` law.
-- Finally in order to resolve information asymmetries and discourage fraud: laws which force the publication of component ingredients in a product or service (but not the method thereof), and which force the prominent display of expiry dates; as well as warnings of danger (e.g., warnings about epileptic siezures on broadcast media, or safety hazards on facilities/equipment) are a permissible exception to the non-negotiability of private property law. Furthermore, the government may make laws requiring corpagents to publish openly, or maintain privately (for the purpose of subpeona for evidence in trials by jury) records which are of interest to common law plaintiffs.
+- Finally in order to resolve information asymmetries and discourage fraud: laws which force the publication of component ingredients in a product or service (but not the method thereof), and which force the prominent display of expiry dates; as well as warnings of danger (e.g., warnings about epileptic siezures on broadcast media, or safety hazards on facilities/equipment) are a permissible exception to the non-negotiability of private property law. Furthermore, the government may make laws requiring corpagents to publish openly, or maintain privately (for the purpose of subpeona for evidence in trials by jury) records which are of interest to common law plaintiffs. Such records shall not track the content of communications; but shall track only information about the nature and identities of the entities involved in the communications.
+  - E.g: Government may make ISPs track the mapping of customer identities to IP address leases assigned via DHCP; but not the content of communications over the lifetime of the connection.
+  - Government may layer such non-content tracking on other service providers that the customer interacts with during the lifetime of the connection. E.g: A conagent connects to the internet and goes on to access an email provider; government may require email providers to maintain non-content logs tracking whom the parties involved in in an email communication were, and the time of transmission; but not the content of the emails.
 
 No other exceptions to the sacrosanctness of the sovereignty of the individual over his/her private property are recognized by this Constitution, including causes such as, natural disasters, non-communicable disease and climate change. Environmental protection mechanisms are specified elsewhere in this constitution.