diff --git a/07-military/07-02-military.md b/07-military/07-02-military.md
index 34e8c4e..db7b76c 100644
--- a/07-military/07-02-military.md
+++ b/07-military/07-02-military.md
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ In cases where a `casus belli` is an asset in a foreign polity:
 - `WS` shall phrase the `casus belli` as the specific asset itself, and not as the government of the foreign political entity.
 - Under extremely well-considered circumstances, `WS` may unilaterally declare strategic "red line" `casus belli` on very well-defined, neighbouring foreign assets if a particular enemy is known to be an expansionist power which has demonstrated that it will eventually become a clear and present danger to the persons and property of `WS`'s residents, if allowed to capture those foreign assets.
 
+] [Apologia]: Lots of these phrases such as "extremely well considered" and "expansionist power", need to be clarified. Use means, motive and opportunity.
+
 > [Apologia]: I.e, `WS` shall not extend an umbrella of protection over any foreign political entity. If `WS` enters into a diplomatic agreement in order to gain access to a maritime route for war readiness, for example, the casus belli shall be the maritime route, and not the foreign government which exercises dominion over the route.
 
 > [Apologia]: If other polities wish to gain an indirect umbrella of protection from `WS`, they are free to strategically contract out access to some valuable asset to the `WS` government, and thereby gain `WS` interest in protecting that particular asset as casus belli.