From dc3bfb13e64b98cb7d68307487de4ae86c1c673f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wellspringcp <69349872+wellspringcp@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:46:41 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Update 15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md --- .../15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/15-torts-and-coordination/15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md b/15-torts-and-coordination/15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md index 51e4f2c..40e1aef 100644 --- a/15-torts-and-coordination/15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md +++ b/15-torts-and-coordination/15-01-non-ameliorable-harmful-activity-apologia.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ It is intentional that the requirement to be able to demonstrate a working, depl ### Liability: -I originally wanted to limit standing to sue under Attempted `NAHA` to individuals against whose person/property the 3rd party damage is likely. But this would make it difficult for whistleblower employees to invoke this regulatory mechanism - and it is likely that they will be the ones in the best position to know when their company is handling entities/substances/processes likely to cause 3rd party harms, in such a manner as to result in harm. Hence the current standing rules, which are that anyone with evidence has standing - we *want* employees of companies doing dangerous things to have legal standing to hold those companies accountable. +I originally wanted to limit standing to sue under Attempted `NAHA` to individuals against whose person/property the 3rd party damage is likely. But this would make it difficult for whistleblower employees to invoke this regulatory mechanism - and it is likely that they will be the ones in the best position to know when their company is handling entities/substances/processes likely to cause 3rd party harms, in such a manner as to result in harm. Hence the current standing rules, which are that any credible witness with evidence has standing - we *want* employees of companies doing dangerous things to have legal standing to hold those companies accountable. ### Defense: