From de610584784caf8f0a2d96093978881a05c08d98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wellspringcp <69349872+wellspringcp@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:13:15 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] Update 07-02-military.md

---
 07-military/07-02-military.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/07-military/07-02-military.md b/07-military/07-02-military.md
index db7b76c..956e397 100644
--- a/07-military/07-02-military.md
+++ b/07-military/07-02-military.md
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ In cases where a `casus belli` is an asset in a foreign polity:
 - `WS` shall phrase the `casus belli` as the specific asset itself, and not as the government of the foreign political entity.
 - Under extremely well-considered circumstances, `WS` may unilaterally declare strategic "red line" `casus belli` on very well-defined, neighbouring foreign assets if a particular enemy is known to be an expansionist power which has demonstrated that it will eventually become a clear and present danger to the persons and property of `WS`'s residents, if allowed to capture those foreign assets.
 
-] [Apologia]: Lots of these phrases such as "extremely well considered" and "expansionist power", need to be clarified. Use means, motive and opportunity.
+> [Apologia]: Lots of these phrases such as "extremely well considered" and "expansionist power", need to be clarified. Use means, motive and opportunity.
 
 > [Apologia]: I.e, `WS` shall not extend an umbrella of protection over any foreign political entity. If `WS` enters into a diplomatic agreement in order to gain access to a maritime route for war readiness, for example, the casus belli shall be the maritime route, and not the foreign government which exercises dominion over the route.