From e19f56c7ef985753df3d8bb26e1c9776cf69eb6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: patergentium Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:09:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update 07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md --- 07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md b/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md index d55d9fe..fcc3085 100644 --- a/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md +++ b/07-military/Xx-sea-lanes.md @@ -1,5 +1,14 @@ # djfjf +## Current best idea: + +We can do sea lane protection by overloading the wartime supply route mechanism. Since + the clearance and safe-maintenance of such wartime supply routes also entails their protection in peace time (to ensure that they need not be cleared when war urgency demands their usage), then it becomes in the interest of other nations to manufacture and supply raw materials and products that are used by 'WS". + +Of course the supply route asset shall designate the business, assets and personnel who are considered cassus belli. It definitely shall not designate nations or their governments. + +## Alternatives: + The idea is that we could sell protection to ships for income? This fixes the "protection of sea lanes" problem. It also gives us a direct mandate to patrol the seas.