Update 08-courts-apologia.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -27,3 +27,5 @@ Even at the time of this writing, we still have not yet formalized induction. Fo
|
|||||||
Until such time as we have formalized induction, we will have to continue using trial by jury. But understand that the aspiration goal of an individualist court system is **not** for a jury to be the final appellate authority. Trial by jury is an imperfect substitute for the true ideal: that Aristotle's **law of identity** itself -- reason itself -- be the final appellate authority.
|
Until such time as we have formalized induction, we will have to continue using trial by jury. But understand that the aspiration goal of an individualist court system is **not** for a jury to be the final appellate authority. Trial by jury is an imperfect substitute for the true ideal: that Aristotle's **law of identity** itself -- reason itself -- be the final appellate authority.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When induction is finally formalized, it is within the intended future of `Wellspring` that a new court process will be adopted which hardcodes the rules of valid inference into the proceedings and drastically reduces the discretion of both judges and juries, to interpret the constitution, and to reason about the facts and the meaning of the laws when arriving at judgments.
|
When induction is finally formalized, it is within the intended future of `Wellspring` that a new court process will be adopted which hardcodes the rules of valid inference into the proceedings and drastically reduces the discretion of both judges and juries, to interpret the constitution, and to reason about the facts and the meaning of the laws when arriving at judgments.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> [Apologia]: Outline in more detail how the transition could/should be approached
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user