Apologia for contagions/biohazards.

01-principles/01-principles-apologia.md

@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ These symbolic paraphernalia are not intended to imply any collectivist/tribal/n
 
 The last few holidays (Exis, ReGRe and EIConI) assert positive philosophical arguments which, being included in the body of the text, leave paltry room for certain destructive philosophies to gain purchase in any discussion of the "meaning" of the text.
 
+## Rights
+
+### Definition of Rights
+
+### Definition of Private Property
+
+We recognize and respect the sovereignty of the individual with exceptions applied for contagions/biohazards and war readiness.
+
+Contagions do not respect private property and do not limit their deleterious effects only to those actors who volitionally put themselves at risk. In order to enforce non-interference, controls on the behaviours of infected/contagious entities may be required. Biohazard may materials into the same category, though not as frequently as contagions because contagions actively seek to propagate themselves, independent of whether or not their host intends to assist them in propagation.
+
 ### Rights protected by `WS`
 
-Here are examples of rights:
-1. Indepagents have a right to think/associate/dissociate freely.
-: 
-- Indepagents have a right to freedom of movement.  
-: Left unimpeded, most indepagents are capable of locomotion. It is therefore their right, **by right**, to move freely subject only to the principle of non-interference (private property law).
-- Indepagents have a right to freedom of speech.
-: Left unimpeded, most indepagents are capable of speech/communication. It is therefore their right, **by right**, to speak freely subject only to the principle of non-interference (private property law).
-- Indepagents have a right to freedom of labour.
-: Left unimpeded, most indepagents are capable of actuating their intentions through labour. It is therefore their right, **by right**, to labour freely subject only to the principle of non-interference (private property law).
-- Indepagents have a right to freedom of contract/trade.
-: Left unimpeded, most indepagents are capable of co-operating and trading upon mutually agreeable terms. It is therefore their right, **by right**, to contract/trade subject only to the principle of non-interference (private property law).
-- And so on.
+Left unimpeded, most indepagents are capable of exercising each of these rights. It is therefore their right, **by right**, to exercise them subject only to the principle of non-interference (private property law).
 
 Here are examples of things which are **not** the exercise of rights, but rather impositions of obligations on **other** indepagents -- i.e., they impede the free exercise of the rights of some **other** indepagent:
 - A "right to healthcare".